Fashion & Retail
Business Services
We draw expertise from various sectors within which we represent our clients – this enable us to provide full range of services to our clients in Fashion, Retail & hobby industry. We are able to tailor our services to your needs as and when they arise. You can always rely on us or as and when your business demands an involvement of a lawyer.
We represent SMEs and start-ups – whether you are an entrepreneur embarking on a start-up venture with a limited retail experience or an experience supplier or retailer, we aim to help you with all your legal needs, so you can focus on maximising your profitability whilst we ensur that your business is legally protected.
Generally, we deal with a full range of matters including but not limited to, container-sharing agreements (for European destinations only), goods in transit (FOB and/or CIF), agency agreements (with defined geographical areas nationally and internationally), supply agreements, manufacturing agreements, dispute with HMRC regarding appropriate Duty, dispute with third party suppliers and customers, debt recovery, enforcement, asset protection, brand protection, employment disputes, intellectual property disputes, theft of data and/or other legal services which are essential and goes to the heart of your business.
Please click here to fill in the form on our home page and one of our dedicated staff members will be in touch to assist.
Interested? Get In Touch For More Information
2024 © Zakery Khub | Solicitors | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Complaints Policy | Press | Modern Slavery
Zakery Khub Solicitors is a trading name of Zakery Khub Solicitors Ltd which is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under company registration number 11251217 – Zakery Khub Solicitors are regulated and authorised by the solicitors regulation authority under SRA Number: 648155
Press ReleaseTHE FCA V AVACADE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (2) ALEXANDRA ASSOCIATES (U.K.) LIMITED
The analysis of Adams and Avacade has now resulted in two different decisions by the Court of Appeal. For precise details of the difference, please refer to the records of our analysis of Adams and Avacade as presented to the Court of Appeal on 7 th and 8 th July 2021.
